Watch “The Real Deal: Jim Fetzer on the Orlando “false flag” shooting” on YouTube — Da UGLY Ducklin

I’m not positive on what really happened in Orlando, but I will say this is a piece that asks some very good questions as to whether or not this is a false flag event.  Just listen to at least the 1st 5-10 minutes.  There are some points made that do make one wonder.

via Watch “The Real Deal: Jim Fetzer on the Orlando “false flag” shooting” on YouTube — Da UGLY Ducklin

4 thoughts on “Watch “The Real Deal: Jim Fetzer on the Orlando “false flag” shooting” on YouTube — Da UGLY Ducklin

    • A good and well-known false-flag operation is from the 60’s, the Gulf of Tonkin incident which helped gain some public rationale, if not outright support, for our participation in Vietnam. The theories out there about the Orlando shooting is that it was instigated by our own government for several reasons; divert attention from Clinton’s problems, promote the gay agenda, and once again go after more gun restrictions.

      I don’t especially like the idea that the US would actually be behind something like this, but recall that the US has exposed prisoners – usually black – to levels of radiation until they died, learning the lethality at different levels of exposure. The same is true of mind control experiments where unknowing victims were slipped LSD to see what would happen, how they might be vulnerable to giving up secrets, etc. in a public situation as well as terminal experiments, again on prisoners.

      I’m not saying I buy Orlando as definitely being a false flag event. I’m saying there are enough questions to make one wonder.

      I appreciate you giving this a read and asking!

      • Thanks for your insight into the treatment of African American prisoners. Life is confusing enough without digging beneath the surface of every news event but it is good to really get under a skin of a story n compare sources. Like wmds in Iraq the truth usually has a way of revealing itself

Leave a reply to minusthecynic Cancel reply