The Exodus Case – Pharaoh’s Army

“The Exodus Case” by Dr. Lennart Moller – Book Review, Part Six of Seven

“28 Then the waters returned and covered the chariots, the horsemen, and all the army of Pharaoh that came into the sea after them. Not so much as one of them remained… 30 So the Lord saved Israel that day out of the hand of the Egyptians, and Israel saw the Egyptians dead on the seashore.” Exodus 14, selected verses.

I had heard that evidence of chariot wheels had been found on a land bridge in the Middle East, possibly being the remains of Pharaoh’s army from Exodus. Not wanting to go off half-cocked, I did an internet search. That search is how I found Dr. Lennart Moller and his book, The Exodus Case.

He has not disappointed with his thorough, scientific method. For what it’s worth, I have two college degrees and I know a little about scholarly research and writing. Dr. Moller reads to me like the real deal, and he has a very serious pedigree as a scientist. See the first part of this series, “The Exodus Case – Part One.”

First, coral doesn’t just start growing. It must attach to something. That’s why people clean large ships out and sink them to start a reef growing. Coral reefs don’t start out of nowhere; they need something to attach to. Hence the ships. In the Gulf of Aqaba, Dr. Moller notes that it has coral reefs like most other bodies of water. But there is one area where there is coral, and it has not formed into a reef. He makes the observation that, on the land bridge off the Nuweiba Peninsula, coral is scattered about like someone tossed out a bunch of garbage. It lies here and there with no discernable pattern. A closer examination reveals what may have happened.

From Dr. Moller: “If skeletal parts lie open and accessible…then corals settle and begin to grow. This can make it very difficult to identify…skeletal parts. There is a large quantity of possible…parts at the place of the crossing, but they are piled up together…which makes the precise identification of individual…parts almost impossible. But there are also several examples of skeletal parts which can be identified.”

On page 248 he has pictures of a piece of coral shaped like a human femur lying next to an actual femur. They are identical. He has other pictures where he can discern human skulls, ribs, spines, and more. One picture on page 251 happens to have captured a fish next to “coral-ized” skeletons to provide scale (no pun intended). He estimates these remains to show no less than 3 individuals (remember, he’s an MD). There are many such identifiable corals on the land bridge. And that isn’t all.

There are identifiable skeletal parts of cows or oxen, which Pharaoh’s army would have used to both transport and be food. There are also parts that can be identified as pieces of horse skeletons.

So we have coral that has apparently grown over parts of skeletons and taken on their shape, which allows them to be identified. We have beasts of burden, which an army would require to supply and feed themselves. We have the horses to pull Pharaoh’s chariots. Oh, yeah! That reminds me.

He found coral in the shapes of chariot wheels. How does he decide that they are shaped as such? Well, on several, not all, but on enough coral shapes you can actually count the spokes. Because technology does improve over time and designs change, Dr. Moller can trace those wheels back to Egyptian chariot wheel designs. There are a variety; 4, 6, and 8 spokes. Why the diversity in one army? Because they wouldn’t just trash a perfectly good chariot because of the new number of spokes. Plus, they would take the chariots of those they defeated in war, adding them to the Egyptian “fleet.” These assertions are evident in Egyptian ruins.

Dr. Moller’s extensive research on chariot wheel design shows that the designs found on the land bridge off the Nuweiba Peninsula match the designs in use by Egypt and its conquests at the time of the Exodus.

One can also make out shapes resembling axles, hub caps (yes, Egyptians had them), and possible pieces of chariot cabs. By being able to make out details on some and very regular, geometric shapes on others, it seems safe to conclude that the corals have grown over man-made objects. Think on it; when do you recall ever seeing a coral reef that had straight lines, right angles, and circular formations? Right. Me neither.

So we have wheels, regular geometric shapes, and identifiable skeletal pieces, along with a huge jumble of coral that hasn’t grown like coral anywhere else in the world. Add it all together, and you have something that looks like the remains of an Egyptian army that got caught without its floaties on.

Let me stress once more, Dr. Moller is very conservative in his assessments and makes no absolute claim that he has definitely found Pharaoh’s army – or anything else discussed so far. He states his theories and presents his evidence. He does the research and analysis, steps back, and (figuratively speaking) says, “Well, it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck. Do you think…?”

Intrigued? The book is available on Amazon. I’d also recommend getting the two DVDs that Amazon will suggest you buy along with it. I got them and, I’m glad I did. The book is 400+ pages with tons of documentation, but VERY readable.

One thought on “The Exodus Case – Pharaoh’s Army

  1. My fav blog of yours yet. I really do enjoy reading about the parting of the sea and Pharoh’s army and all. I knew it had to be there some where (even though he doesn’t claim that is the area for debris for sure). I figure even is the secular folks found it you wouldn’t hear a word. Besides no real “bounty” they could sacavage off of it like the other ships full of treasures.

    Good stuff!

Your ideas are important too!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s